Skip to content
ImperialApply
Checking sign-in…Workspace →

Writing examples: from evidence to review

Explore 39 original teaching cases across 13 programmes. Choose a question and follow the evidence, paragraph plan, full teaching draft and detailed review. Free to explore, with no sign-in or credits required.

Original fictional teaching case · Free to explore

Who benefits from an automated service?

Follow a developed example from evidence to paragraph planning, a full teaching draft and five review comments. The draft deliberately retains issues to discuss. These are fictional teaching cases, not real admission results; viewing them does not change your work.

1 · Evidence notes

English sample notes: separate observed work, future intentions and missing evidence. The situation is invented for teaching.

  • Economics student; classroom analysis of hypothetical automation in a public service.
  • Separated average processing time from access for people needing assisted applications.
  • Interested in junior policy research; no implemented government proposal.
  • Preparation and fallback plan: For an initial research role, I would look for work involving source checks, policy comparisons and clear summaries of uncertain evidence. I plan to practise by taking a public proposal and separating its stated objective, the groups affected and the claims that would need testing. A junior role in a research organisation or public-service analysis team could provide relevant preparation. I would assess the actual responsibilities rather than assume a job title guarantees influence. Before seeking ownership of an evaluation, I want to become reliable at making the limits of an argument visible to the people using it.
  • Progress check: I would use feedback on my written analysis to identify where an argument needs better evidence or a clearer account of the people affected.
  • Analysis: distinguish people completing alone, needing assistance and absent from recorded process. The table did not estimate group sizes or prove exclusion; it identified limits of the available measure.